The D'Arcy Archive
Somerset · found 13 September 2026

Chew Magna

Kept as a wrong page. It argued that Hannah Saniger was born in this Somerset parish; her baptism is at Berkeley, in Gloucestershire, and was found on 21 September. What outlived the argument is a Saniger family at Chew Magna that this archive had published as not existing.

This page is wrong, and it is kept here for that reason.

Everything below was built on the belief that Hannah Saniger was not born in Gloucestershire — a belief that came from a single yes/no tick in the 1841 census. The 1851 census, taken in the same house, states her birthplace outright: Berkeley, Gloucestershire. The argument on this page is sound and its premise is false. What actually settled it →

Every English document this archive holds agrees on one negative: whatever Hannah Saniger was, she was not born in Gloucestershire. The 1841 census at Drivers Fields says so with a tick, and says the same of the seventy-year-old Lyddya Sinegar living in the house. The reconstitution of all 81 Gloucestershire Saniger households says so by exhaustion. The passenger register dittoed the question instead of answering it.

So the county has to be somewhere else. Here is a Saniger household in Bristol ten years later, and it names one.

1851, Gloucestershire, Clifton district, enumeration district 1u — St Philip and Jacob Out, Bristol · HO107/1954, folio 562, page 30, schedule 102

Oxford Road, St Philip and Jacob

NameRelationCond.AgeOccupationBorn
William SANIGER Head Married 27 Smith Journeyman Somerset, CHEW MAGNA
Caroline SANIGER Wife Married 28 — Gloucestershire, Fishponds
Elizabeth SANIGER Mother Widow 60 — Somerset, CHEW MAGNA

Address as written: Oxford Road.

1841, Somerset, Chew district — Chew Magna, piece 938, book 6, folio 6, page 6

And ten years earlier, in the parish itself

NameSexAgeOccupationBorn in county
Thomas VEALE M55 Spade MakerSomerset
Elizabeth VEALE F50 —Somerset
George VEALE M15 Spade MakerSomerset
James VEALE M12 —Somerset
Charles VEALE M9 —Somerset
Harriet PYKE F25 —Somerset
Elizabeth SANIGAR F45 —Somerset

Address as written: Battles Lane.

Ten years before Oxford Road, the same woman is in Chew Magna itself — in a spade-maker's house on Battles Lane, spelled SANIGAR. Her age moves from 45 to 60 across the decade, which is what 1841 ages do: that census rounded adults down to the nearest five.

This is what makes the 1851 birthplace worth acting on. A clerk in Bristol writing “Chew Magna” could have been mishearing something. He was not: the family is in the parish, under a spelling this archive already knows, ten years earlier. documented

And Thomas Veale's trade is the one Collinson names. Writing fifty years earlier he said Chew Magna's “only manufacture are a few edge-tools and stockings”. A spade-maker on Battles Lane in 1841 is the last of the edge-tools.

The name is at Chew Magna in more than one form. Besides Elizabeth SANIGAR in 1841, the 1891 census finds a Julia SINEGAR living there — SINEGAR being the exact spelling the 1841 enumerator used for the seventy-year-old widow in the Wakefields' house at Drivers Fields. Lyddya Sinegar →

Why it fits

Four constraints, and a parish that meets all of them

  1. The county is right, and it is the only thing the 1841 census will tell us. At Drivers Fields in 1841 the enumerator ticked Hannah Wakefield as NOT born in Gloucestershire, and ticked Lyddya Sinegar, aged seventy, the same way. Somerset is the county on the other side of the river.
  2. The parish is next door. St Philip and Jacob adjoins St Paul, where the Wakefields were living in 1841 and where Miriam was born in 1840. These are neighbouring Bristol parishes, not distant towns.
  3. The generation is right. Elizabeth Saniger is sixty in 1851, so born about 1791. Lyddya Sinegar is seventy in 1841, so born about 1771. Hannah is thirty-five in 1841, so born about 1806. Three Saniger women of three generations, all in east Bristol, none of them born in Gloucestershire.
  4. The trade is right, and it is the thread running through the whole surname. William Saniger is a journeyman smith and James Wakefield a journeyman mason. And Chew Magna, says Collinson, had been “a large clothing town” — the same trade that runs through every Saniger this archive has found at Berkeley, Dursley and Cam, where they are clothiers, weavers, tuckers and curriers.
And why it is not a finding.
  • Nothing yet joins Elizabeth Saniger of Chew Magna to Hannah Saniger of Drivers Fields. They are not shown to be sisters, cousins or anything else.
  • Saniger is not a rare name in the Bristol region, and the reconstitution already found 81 Gloucestershire households of it.
  • Chew Magna is six miles from Bristol, and Collinson's 830 inhabitants make it a small place to pin a family on from one census line.
This is a place to look, arrived at by elimination and proximity. It is the best one this archive has had, and it is still a hypothesis. a lead, not a link
Collinson's Somerset, 1791

What the place was

“a large and populous parish, very pleasantly situated at the distance of SIX MILES SOUTH-WEST FROM BRISTOL … containing within its precincts one hundred and seventy houses, and eight hundred and thirty inhabitants.”

And one line changes how this lead reads. “In former days this was a borough, a market, and a LARGE CLOTHING TOWN, neither of which characteristics belong to it now … its only manufacture are a few edge-tools and stockings.”

Every Saniger this archive has found in Gloucestershire is in cloth — a clothier at Saniger in 1692, weavers, tuckers and curriers at Cam and Dursley through the eighteenth century, and a family that leaves for Bristol when the trade collapses. Chew Magna is a decayed clothing town six miles from Bristol on the other side of the county line. The trade, across the whole surname → a pattern, not a proof
A records fact worth having before anyone writes to Taunton. “The living of Chew is a peculiar.” A peculiar lay outside the bishop's ordinary jurisdiction and proved its own wills — so probate for Chew Magna people ran through the Peculiar of Chew, which the Somerset Heritage Centre records as a separate court down to 1787.On the queue →

Collinson holds no Sanigers at Chew Magna, and that is not evidence of anything: he copies gentry monuments and benefactions, and a journeyman smith's family would not appear in either. read, and empty

Two numbers on this page were wrong when it was published this morning. This page first said Chew Magna lay eight miles from Bristol in a parish of roughly 1,800 people. Collinson, who was writing in 1791, says six miles and 830 inhabitants. Both of my figures were guesses dressed as facts, and they are corrected here rather than quietly replaced.Where those go →
Coverage before absence

The obvious next search cannot be run

No Saniger at Chew Magna in FreeREG's Somerset holdings, in any spelling, between 1780 and 1840. The only Somerset Saniger in that window is a marriage at Walcot: Edmund Liddall and Rachel Saniger, 8 June 1819.

That looks like a null result. It is not, and the rule on this site is to find out which before saying anything. Three forenames of SMITH across Somerset for the twenty-one years 1795–1815.

ControlSomerset entriesParishesAt Chew Magna
William Smith271851
Mary Smith3711151
John Smith301970

943 Smith entries across 21 years and 100-odd Somerset parishes. Chew Magna accounts for TWO of them, against a hundred at Walcot and sixty-nine at Bath. Collinson counted 830 people there in 1791 — smaller than Bath, certainly, but not so small that twenty-one years of registers should yield two entries of the commonest surname in England.

FreeREG's Chew Magna transcript is a fragment. Searching it for Sanigers and finding none proves precisely nothing — which is why this page reports a place to look rather than a result. coverage established by control test

What happens next

  1. Chew Magna's own register, 1795–1815. The originals are at the Somerset Heritage Centre and filmed on the subscription sites. A baptism for Hannah Saniger, daughter of John and Lydia, would close the oldest open question on this site in one line. On the queue →
  2. And it would test the tree at the same time. The family tree says Hannah was born at Berkeley on 23 July 1805, daughter of John Saniger who died there in 1824. The 1841 census says she was not born in Gloucestershire, and Berkeley is in Gloucestershire. Those two statements cannot both be true. What Berkeley holds →
  3. The Bristol chapels remain the other half of the answer. Twelve RG 4 volumes can hold a birth in this window. They are listed →
A generation named · 21 September 2026

Elizabeth's husband has a name, and this page said he did not exist

On 13 September this archive searched FindMyPast for Sanigers at Chew Magna and published the result as «None, in any spelling». That is false, and it was false the day it was written. Somerset Baptisms holds two of them, and they are Elizabeth's own children.

ChildBaptisedFatherMotherParish
Charles Sinagar1816SIMONElizabethChew Magna
William Sinegar1822SIMONElizabethChew Magna

documented

And the 1851 household closes on them. The census above gives William Saniger, head, 27, smith journeyman, born Chew Magna, with his mother Elizabeth Saniger, widow, 60, born Chew Magna living with him at Oxford Road. The register gives William Sinegar, baptised at Chew Magna in 1822, son of Simon and Elizabeth. Twenty-seven in the spring of 1851 puts his birth about 1824; a baptism in 1822 is inside the ordinary slack of a census age, and the 1841 return for this same woman — 45, when she was nearer 50 — shows how much slack these ages carry.

So the household runs back a generation. Simon Saniger and Elizabeth of Chew Magna, with sons Charles in 1816 and William in 1822; Simon dead before 1851, since she is entered as a widow; and Elizabeth born in the parish herself, which makes Simon the incomer. inferred

Where a Simon comes from, if he comes from anywhere. There is exactly one Simon among the 158 SANIGER baptisms in England Births & Baptisms 1538-1975, read in full for this archive: Simon Saniger, baptised at Berkeley in 1786, father William. A man of that name and age could be the father at Chew Magna — thirty at the first christening, thirty-six at the second — and it would put a Berkeley Saniger in a Somerset parish a generation before Hannah's family arrived in Bristol.

It is a candidate and nothing more. No marriage of a Simon to an Elizabeth has been found, at Chew Magna or anywhere: the wildcard S*N*G* across every parish and BMD set at Chew Magna returns four records in total, and neither of the other two is this name. Until that marriage or a burial turns up, one Simon in a register and another Simon in a register are two men with the same name. a lead, not a link

None of this touches Hannah. It is still not her family. Neither child is Hannah, the dates are wrong for her, and the 1851 census names her birthplace as Berkeley in her own household. What changes is the reason: this page used to say the Chew Magna idea failed because there were no Sanigers there at all, and there were. It fails because the Sanigers who were there are a different household, and because Hannah's own birthplace is stated elsewhere in her own words. not claimed