The D'Arcy Archive
1799–1863

Catherine LUCY Eliza Hyde

Of Clifton, Somerset, England.

FamilyAsserted by the family tree. No record has been found for them, and none has been shown against them either. How this archive grades a claim →

Catherine LUCY Eliza Hyde1799–1863in the tree
marriedJoseph D'Arcy1780–1848tree
written in a record this archive has read from the family tree, untested

None of the 7 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →

The record

Born19 MAY 1799Clifton, Somerset, England
Died16 APR 1863Lymington, Hampshire, England

Family

Married

Joseph D'Arcy · 11 NOV 1830

Children

Catherine Lucy Jane D'Arcy (1831–1877) · John Hyde D'Arcy (1832–1852) · Josephine D'Arcy (1834–1903) · Frank Hyde D'Arcy (1838–1868) · Joseph William D'Arcy (1840–1882) · William David d'Arcy (b. 1842)

Where this comes from

No relationship on this page has been checked against a record — the parents, marriages and children drawn above are what the family tree says. Nothing else has been found for them either way. How claims are labelled →

This person has a page because the tree names them beside someone this archive follows. Nothing has been researched for them here, and records that carry their name are filed in the register under the name and not assigned to them: a name is not a person.

Every entry naming Catherine LUCY Eliza Hyde in the register →

What is written about Catherine

Carried across from the family tree, with its markup stripped. Family testimony, not an independent record — valuable, and labelled.

Lived at Priestlands Millford Hampshire and in 1838 registered in Madeira Portugal

Sources attached in the tree

  • Elliott Web Site — Catherine Lucy Eliza D'Arcy (born Hyde)

These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →

← All 844 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled