The Sneyds of the Potteries
Every Staffordshire Sneyd record, assembled into households — which finally produces the family the tree has been pointing at, and moves one of its dates by twelve years.
This morning this archive reported the Sneyd line unevidenced. By evening it had found two of its four links. Reconstituting the county — all 551 records read individually and assembled into 94 households — produces the third, and corrects the tree in the process.
William Sneyd, weaver, and his thirteen children
On 27 March 1769 William Sneyd, weaver, married Mary Blackbourne at Madeley, witnessed by Robert Sneyd. That record → Here is what follows it in the same register:
| Baptised | Child | Mother | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jul 1769 | William | (not recorded) | Weaver — three months after the marriage |
| 21 Feb 1772 | Dinah | (not recorded) | |
| 29 Dec 1773 | Theodosia | (not recorded) | |
| 3 Nov 1776 | Sarah | (not recorded) | |
| 22 Aug 1779 | James | MARY | the one entry that names the mother |
| 4 Jun 1781 | Samuel | (not recorded) | THE ONE — the tree puts him in 1769 |
| 1 Jan 1784 | Lydia | (not recorded) | |
| 6 Nov 1785 | Mary | (not recorded) | |
| 26 Mar 1786 | Ellen | (not recorded) | |
| 11 Apr 1788 | Mary | (not recorded) | |
| 23 May 1788 | Ann | (not recorded) | |
| 14 Feb 1791 | Fletcher? | (not recorded) | father now entered as Blacksmith |
| 16 Dec 1794 | Margaret | (not recorded) |
Samuel is 1781, not 1769
The family tree says Samuel Sneyd, born 1769 at Madeley, son of William Sneyd and Mary Blackbourne. This archive searched for that baptism twice today and reported it missing both times.
It is missing because it is not in 1769. The register's Samuel, son of William, is baptised 4 June 1781. The year 1769 belongs to his eldest brother William, christened three months after the wedding — which is exactly the kind of slip a family tree makes when it has a marriage date and guesses the child from it.
And the lesson, which is the third of its kind today. I searched for the tree's date instead of the tree's person. The 1781 Samuel was in every result list I pulled, and I discarded him each time for being twelve years out. Recorded →
Madeley does not write the mothers down
Of 73 Madeley baptisms in this set, only 10 name the mother; 61 give the father alone. Reconstitution works by grouping on both parents, so at Madeley it cannot separate two contemporary Williams — and the raw grouping duly produced one impossible "William" with thirty-four children spanning 1702 to 1794.
Samuel Sneyd, grocer, in his own shop
| Name | Relation | Age | Occupation | Born |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samuel Sneyd | Head | 72 | GROCER | MADELEY, STAFFORDSHIRE |
| Elizabeth Sneyd | Wife | 71 | — | OSWESTRY, SHROPSHIRE |
| James Sneyd | Son | 33 | Engraver | Hanley, Staffordshire |
| Elizabeth Ann Sneyd | Daughter | 11 | — | Hanley, Staffordshire |
| Harvey Bradbury | Visitor | 20 | Shoemaker | Longton, Staffordshire |
And it settles “Staly Cladwin”. The 1861 enumerator wrote something at Well Street that the transcriber could not read and rendered as a Shropshire place that does not exist. The 1851 enumerator, ten years earlier, wrote OSWESTRY.
One thing moves. The tree gives Samuel's birth as 1769 and this archive corrected that to the Madeley baptism of 4 June 1781. The 1851 census says he was 72, so born about 1779; the burial register said 77 in September 1855, so about 1778. Three records now cluster around 1778–79, which sits between the tree's 1769 and the archive's 1781 and matches neither exactly. The Madeley baptism remains the best candidate — it has the right father, mother, parish and trade — but the ages do not endorse it as cleanly as they rule out 1769.
Sixty years in one street
| Year | Address | Household | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | Well Street, Hanley | SAMUEL SNEYD, 72, grocer, born Madeley · Elizabeth his wife, 71, born Oswestry · James, 33, engraver · Elizabeth Ann, 11 | HO107/2004 f.138 p.13 |
| 1855 | 91 Well St. | Samuel buried from this address, 23 September, aged 77 | Hanley St John the Evangelist, entry 2330 |
| 1861 | Well St, Grocers Shop | JAMES SNEYD, 42, engraver · Ann his wife, 41 · Elizabeth A 21 and Mary J 18, both PAINTRESSES · James A, 10 · and Elizabeth, 82, WIDOW, born Shropshire | piece 1932 f.38 sch.22 |
| 1871 | Well Street | James, 53, engraver · Ann, 52 · James A, 20, ENGRAVER | RG10/2857 f.37 p.10 sch.46 |
| 1881 | 20, Well Street | James, 63, ENGRAVER (POTTER) · Anne, 61 · Mary Elizabeth MULLOCK (Sneyd), granddaughter, 17, dressmaker | RG11/2719 f.12 p.18 sch.90 |
The granddaughter of 1881 is entered as Mary Elizabeth MULLOCK (Sneyd), born Hanley about 1864 — so one of the paintress daughters of 1861 married a Mullock. A thread this archive has not followed.
And Elizabeth's own baptism
ELIZABETH OLIVER, born 17 MAY 1782, baptised 19 May 1782 · father DAVID Oliver, mother MARY.
The tree says Elizabeth Margaret Oliver, born 7 May 1787 at Oswestry.
It also gives a generation this archive has never had: DAVID OLIVER and MARY, of Oswestry.
The Audlem marriage
The tree says Samuel Sneyd married Elizabeth Margaret Oliver at AUDLEM, CHESHIRE on 22 October 1809.
The test. Audlem's registers are indexed twice over — Cheshire Diocese of Chester Parish Marriages AND the Bishop's Transcripts. A control search for SMITH marrying at Audlem between 1804 and 1814 returns twenty entries from both collections.
The result. No Sneyd, in any spelling, marries at Audlem in that window. Widening to every Sneyd record at Audlem of any date and any type returns thirty-six results and every one is a civil registration after 1837 from Nantwich, Crewe or Congleton. Not one Sneyd appears in Audlem's parish registers at all.
91 Well Street, and the year that was wrong
The tree said: Samuel Sneyd, born 1769 at Madeley, “a grocer of Hanley”, died 20 September 1856 at No 3, Well St, Hanley. Nothing stood behind it. Here is the burial register.
| Register | Hanley, St John the Evangelist · parish register, entry 2330 |
| Buried | 23 September 1855 |
| Name | Samuel SNEYD |
| Age | 77 |
| Abode | 91 Well St. |
Searched for every Samuel Sneyd death registered anywhere in England and Wales between March 1854 and December 1858. There is exactly one.documented
| What the tree said | What the records say | |
|---|---|---|
| The street | Well Street | CONFIRMED — and the register gives the number as 91, not 3 |
| The year | 1856 | WRONG. He was buried on 23 September 1855, and the only Samuel Sneyd death registered in England and Wales in five years is the September quarter of 1855 at Stoke |
| The day | 20 September | CONSISTENT. A death on the 20th and a burial on the 23rd is an ordinary three-day interval; it is the year that is out, not the date |
| His age | born 1769, so 87 | The register says 77, which puts his birth about 1778 |
| His widow | Elizabeth Margaret Oliver, died 1 December 1861 | CONFIRMED — Deaths, December quarter 1861, Sneyd Elizabeth, Stoke, 6b 66 |
So a claim that had no record behind it three days ago now has three: a burial with an age and a house number, a death registration with a volume and page, and a census that finds his widow in the same street six years later. Two details in it were wrong, and both are the kind that a family tree gets wrong — a year, and a street number.
Well Street, Hanley — the grocer's shop
The family tree makes two very specific, entirely unverified claims about this line: that Samuel Sneyd, born Madeley 1769, "a grocer of Hanley", died on 20 September 1856 at No 3, Well St, Hanley; and that he left a widow, Elizabeth Margaret Oliver of Oswestry, Shropshire, who outlived him by five years and died on 1 December 1861. No record behind either. Nobody had ever opened a Staffordshire census.
Here is Well Street five years later.
| Name | Relation | Cond. | Age | Occupation | Born |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James SNEYD | Head | M | 42 | Engraver | Staffordshire, Hanley |
| Ann SNEYD | Wife | M | 41 | — | Staffordshire, Hanley |
| Elizabeth A SNEYD | Dau | U | 21 | Paintress | Staffordshire, Hanley |
| Mary J SNEYD | Dau | U | 18 | Paintress | Staffordshire, Hanley |
| James A SNEYD | Son | U | 10 | Scholar | Staffordshire, Hanley |
| Elizabeth SNEYD | Mother | W | 82 | — | Shropshire, Staly Cladwin |
The address in the enumerator's own hand: Well St, Grocers Shop.
| What the tree says | What the census says | |
|---|---|---|
| The street | No 3, Well St, Hanley | Well St, Hanley |
| The trade | “a grocer of Hanley” | the enumerator writes GROCERS SHOP against the address |
| The wife | Elizabeth Margaret Oliver | Elizabeth — and a WIDOW; Samuel was buried from Well Street in September 1855 |
| Her county | born at OSWESTRY, SHROPSHIRE, 7 May 1787 | born SHROPSHIRE |
| Her death | 1 December 1861, Staffordshire | CONFIRMED in the GRO index: Deaths, December quarter 1861, Stoke, 6b 66 — eight months after the enumerator called |
| Her age | would make her 73 | the enumerator wrote 82 — eight years out, and not explained |
And one number does not fit. One number does not fit. Born 1787, she is seventy-three in April 1861; the enumerator wrote EIGHTY-TWO. Ages on a census are what somebody in the house said on the night, and eighty-two for seventy-three is a large error — but it is the kind of error an eighty-year-old household makes about its oldest member, and it is the only figure on the page that argues against the identification. It is printed here rather than quietly dropped.
What it does give outright is a household: a James Sneyd, engraver, born Hanley about 1819, with two daughters who paint pottery for a living. The tree gives Samuel and Elizabeth five children and this archive publishes only one of them — Samuel Charles, born Hanley 1810, who sailed. James stayed, kept the shop, and engraved.
And why this took so long to find. FreeCEN holds 1861 for Staffordshire and, on testing, nothing else: a control search for John Smith born 1800–1805 in Staffordshire returns 31 people and every one of them is 1861. So Samuel Sneyd, who died in 1856, could never have appeared however hard he was looked for — and his son Samuel Charles had been in Australia for twenty-four years. coverage established by control test
Ann's parents, and the night the family slept in two houses
This archive knew James Sneyd's wife as «Ann» across four censuses, then as ANN BIDDULPH from a free index, and said plainly that her parents were a generation it had never had. The 1851 census names them.
Queen Street, Stoke upon Trent — seven people
| Name | In the house | Status | Age | Born | Occupation | Birthplace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Biddulph | Head | Married | 53 | 1798 | Coal dealer | Bermondsey, Surrey |
| Julia Biddulph | Wife | Married | 52 | 1799 | — | Shelton, Staffordshire |
| Mary Biddulph | Daughter | Unmarried | 21 | 1830 | Paintress (potts) | Stoke, Staffordshire |
| Eliza Biddulph | Daughter | Unmarried | 19 | 1832 | Servant | Stoke, Staffordshire |
| Anne Sneyd | DAUGHTER | Married | 31 | 1820 | Dressmaker | Shelton, Staffordshire |
| Mary Sneyd | GRAND DAUGHTER | — | 8 | 1843 | Scholar | Hanley, Staffordshire |
| James A Sneyd | GRAND SON | — | 0 | 1851 | — | Hanley, Staffordshire |
And Well Street, the same night — five people
| Name | In the house | Status | Age | Born | Occupation | Birthplace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samuel Sneyd | Head | Married | 72 | 1779 | Grocer | Madeley, Staffordshire |
| Elizabeth Sneyd | Wife | Married | 71 | 1780 | — | Oswestry, Shropshire |
| James Sneyd | Son | Married | 33 | 1818 | Engraver | Hanley, Staffordshire |
| Elizabeth Ann Sneyd | Daughter | Unmarried | 11 | 1840 | — | Hanley, Staffordshire |
| Harvey Bradbury | Visitor | Unmarried | 20 | 1831 | Shoemaker | Longton, Staffordshire |
Where the Staffordshire Sneyds are
| Parish | Records |
|---|---|
| Madeley | 149 |
| Wolstanton | 47 |
| Swynnerton | 38 |
| Stoke-upon-Trent | 37 |
| Burslem | 32 |
| Bilston | 26 |
| Uttoxeter | 24 |
| Stone | 18 |
| Ipstones | 18 |
| Tamworth | 13 |
Madeley holds 149 of 551 — and Keele, the hall the discredited graft reached for, is four miles up the road and holds a handful. The family this archive actually descends from were weavers, carpenters, blacksmiths, brickmakers and labourers in the Potteries. The graft →
And the weaver himself has a burial at last — or one of two
The Sneyd line's oldest name is WILLIAM SNEYD OF MADELEY, and until today he rested on a citation reading “Sneyd Web Site”, a birth year of 1746, AND NO DEATH AT ALL. The National Burial Index holds eight William Sneyds buried at MADELEY ALL SAINTS across two hundred and fifty years — 1574, 1640, 1659, 1762, 1780, 1791, and then two that matter:
| buried 1819 | aged 88, born about 1731 | He would have been 38 at the weaver's marriage and 63 at the last of his children. Possible, and old. |
| buried 13 MAY 1827 | AGED 84, born about 1743 | He would have been 26 at the marriage and 51 at the last child — the natural fit, and within three years of the 1746 the tree gives him. |
What has changed is the shape of the problem. Yesterday the oldest Sneyd was a web page. Today he is one of two documented burials in the right parish, with ages, and the better of the two agrees with the tree to within three years — which is what a stated age at burial does.
Ann has a surname at last
Four censuses give James Sneyd the engraver a wife called ANN and nothing more — Ann, 41, in 1861; Ann, 52, in 1871; Anne, 61, in 1881. The free Staffordshire index names her.
And it names four children, by their mother's maiden name
The Staffordshire birth index records the MOTHER'S MAIDEN NAME beside every child. Four Sneyd births carry BIDDULPH:
| Child | Born | District | Reference | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Ann Sneyd | 1839 | Shelton | SHE/003/001 | “Elizabeth Ann, 11” in 1851 and “Elizabeth A, 21” in 1861 |
| Mary Julia Sneyd | 1842 | Hanley | HAN/005/004 | the “Mary J, 18” of 1861, a PAINTRESS — and her full name for the first time |
| Catherine Sneyd | 1845 | Hanley | HAN/007/057 | NEW. She is in no census this archive has read; she did not survive to 1851, or she was elsewhere on both nights |
| James Arthur Sneyd | 1850 | Hanley | HAN/012/032 | the “James A, 10” of 1861 and the “James A, 20, ENGRAVER” of 1871 — his full name too |
And one detail the index states plainly
Elizabeth Ann was born in 1839. The marriage is 1842. The eldest child came three years before the wedding, and the registrar recorded her under her father's surname with her mother's maiden name beside it, which is exactly how the index is built to work.
Searched 15 September 2026 at staffordshirebmd.org.uk — 391 Sneyd births and 322 Sneyd marriages, free, and never used by this archive before.
Thirty-six Sneyd wills, and a labourer at Keele
The Diocese of Lichfield and Coventry wills index, 1550–1810, is free and this archive had never opened it. It returns thirty-six Sneyds. Not one of them is of MADELEY. documented
Staffordshire Name Indexes, staffsnameindexes.org.uk, searched 14 September 2026. The site indexes twenty-six collections but NOT parish registers or bishop's transcripts, so it cannot answer the Madeley burials directly.
What it does to the Keele graft
| Name | Status | Of | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| William Sneyd | not given | Keele, Wolstanton | 1620 |
| Richard Sneyd | gentleman | Stafford and Keele | 1684 |
| Ralph Sneyd | esquire | Keele | 1704 |
| Sarah Sneyd | widow | Keele | 1706 |
| Ralph Sneyd | esquire | Keele | 1734 |
| Ralph Sneyd | not given | Keele | 1737 |
| Ralph Sneyd | gentleman | Keele | 1743 |
| Richard Sneyd | LABOURER | Keele | 1772 |
| Edward Sneyd | not given | Keele | 1780 |
| William Sneyd | gentleman | Keele | 1783 |
This archive has an open question it calls the Keele graft: whether its own Sneyds were attached to the Sneyds of Keele Hall by someone who wanted a better ancestor. The labourer cuts the question loose from the answer. Being a Sneyd of Keele does not make a man gentry, because in 1772 a Sneyd of Keele was a labourer. A humble Sneyd in that parish needs no descent from the squires to explain him. it weakens the graft without disproving it
And nothing at Madeley
Sneyd of Madeley returns nothing in an index of thirty-six Sneyd wills spanning two hundred and sixty years. The control is the same search without a place, which returns all thirty-six, so the engine and the surname both work. a controlled null
The rest cluster where this archive already knew to look: yeomen at Woodhead in Burslem in 1707 and 1717, a gentleman at The Birches, Burslem in 1708, a spinster at Woodhead in 1722, a wheelwright at Newcastle under Lyme in 1676. The Potteries, two generations before the potteries.
Catherine, who lived four years
She was born at Hanley in 1845 — Staffordshire BMD reference HAN/007/057, mother's maiden name Biddulph — and this archive found her there yesterday, new to it, as the fourth child of James and Ann. She is in neither of the two households the family occupied on census night in March 1851, and now there is a reason: she had been dead for sixteen months.
Elizabeth Margaret Oliver gets a father with a trade, a street, a grave and three children
This archive has had her baptism — Oswestry St Oswald's, 19 May 1782, father David Oliver, mother Mary — from a paid index, and nothing else. The Shropshire Parish Register Society's volumes are printed, free and out of copyright, and they were never opened here. They give the family whole.
| The register says | What it adds |
|---|---|
| David Oliver, cooper, of Cross Street, Oswestry | An occupation and an address this archive did not have. |
| Buried at Oswestry 21 June 1808, aged 59 | Which puts his birth about 1749. |
| Dianna, baptised 23 March 1777 | Her sister, and the first sibling Elizabeth has ever had here. |
| Elizabeth, baptised 19 May 1782 | «Elizabeth, d. of David Oliver, Cross St., & Mary, b. 7». |
| David, baptised 12 July 1789 | «s. of David Oliver, cooper, Cross Street, & Mary» — her brother. |
And a candidate for her mother, called a candidate
The baptisms give the mother only as «Mary». The printed Llanyblodwel register has «1772, June 12. David Oliver of Oswestry p: bac: & MARY OWENS sp: … lic: mar». He is of the right parish; the forename pair matches; 1772 sits properly before 1777, 1782 and 1789; and a man buried in 1808 aged 59 was about twenty-three in 1772. Against it: nothing links the entry to the baptisms except those fits, and David and Mary are two of the commonest names on this border — the same volumes hold David Olivers at Blodwell, Trefyrclawdd, Pentreshanel, Sweeney and Willow Street across a century. The control is that the shortlist is one long: all eight volumes hold exactly one David Oliver marriage between 1765 and 1782, and the only other in the series is to an Anne Morris in 1799.
And Madeley, where the Sneyds come from, turns out to be two places
The Staffordshire Parish Register Society printed Madeley. The volume is on the Internet Archive and is lending-restricted — its text returns HTTP 401 and a borrow needs an account this archive will not make. Its public snippets still show «Margaret d. of William Sneyd, Weaver» and «Thomas s. of William Sneyd of Gt. Madeley», and this archive holds Samuel Sneyd baptised at Madeley All Saints in 1781 with his father given as William Sneyd, weaver. The snippets carry no years, so nothing is attached: those are children of a weaver of that name in that parish and no more. What it settles for nothing is that the register distinguishes Great Madeley from Little Madeley — and this archive has written «Madeley All Saints» from the beginning without ever asking which half.