Sutton
16 people named Sutton that this archive publishes, 5 on the direct line, 1535–1736.
16 people named Sutton are published in this archive: 16 dead. 5 are on the direct line, the spine this archive is built on. The dead lived between 1535 and 1736. Where the tree says they were born: Averham (11) · Averham Park · Mansfield · Rushton · West Farleigh.
What stands behind these people
This archive grades each person by what it has established about them, and nothing else. For the 16 people of this name who are dead:
- above a graft 5 — reached only through the Hornby join (5), a single unevidenced link that this archive has looked for and not found (the Hornby claim).
- family tree only 11 — asserted by the family tree, with nothing found for them either way.
No record naming anyone of this name has been read. A family tree is a witness and not a source, and that is why the grade is printed here and not left to be assumed. How claims are labelled →
Where Sutton meets the spine
| Number | Generation | Person | Parent of |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1025 | 11 | Bridget Sutton | Robert Darcy (number 512) |
| 2050 | 12 | Robert Ambrose Sutton | Bridget Sutton (number 1025) |
| 4100 | 13 | William Sutton | Robert Ambrose Sutton (number 2050) |
| 4105 | 13 | Anne Sutton | Marshal Frederic von Schomberg (number 2052) |
| 8200 | 14 | William SUTTON | William Sutton (number 4100) |
The families it is joined to
Worked out from the marriages and the parents of the people below, where the other person has a different surname. A name that links has a page of its own here.
Everyone of the name, as far as the archive names them
These 16 people fall into 2 groups that the published people do not tie to one another — no shared parent, brother or sister, spouse or child among the people this archive names. The tree may tie them in ways it does not publish, and nothing this archive holds says they are one family.
Group 1 — 15 people
1535–1736 · born at Averham · Averham Park · Mansfield · 4 on the direct line
Brothers and sisters · 3 show ↓ hide ↑
Brothers and sisters · 1 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Brothers and sisters · 8 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Brothers and sisters · 8 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Brothers and sisters · 8 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Brothers and sisters · 8 show ↓ hide ↑
No brothers or sisters are recorded for Mary St. Leger here.
Brothers and sisters · 8 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Brothers and sisters · 8 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Brothers and sisters · 8 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Brothers and sisters · 8 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Brothers and sisters · 8 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Brothers and sisters · 2 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Brothers and sisters · 3 show ↓ hide ↑
Brothers and sisters · 2 show ↓ hide ↑
No marriage is recorded for them here, so there is no second family to show.
Group 2 — 1 person
1593–1615 · born at Rushton · 1 on the direct line
There is no children strip on these rows: this archive records siblings and records no children, and the row shows what is there.