John Sutton
Of West Farleigh, Kent, UK.
FamilyAsserted by the family tree. No record has been found for them, and none has been shown against them either. How this archive grades a claim →
None of the 10 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →
3 of these links sit above a graft. The archive has tested the join they hang from and rejected it — the D'Arcys of Hornby Castle are unevidenced, the Sneyds of Keele Hall disproved. The people are drawn because the tree carries them, and struck through because nothing attaches them to this family. Both grafts, in full →
The record
| Born | 27 MAY 1599 | West Farleigh, Kent, UK |
| Died | — | West Farleigh, Kent, England |
Family
Parents
William Sutton · Susan (Caney) Coney
Brothers and sisters
Alice SUTTON (b. 1595) · Elizabeth SUTTON (1597–1595) · Gervace Sutton (1597–1598) · Henry SUTTON (1589–1629) · Mary SUTTON (b. 1603) · Richard SUTTON (b. 1587) · Robert Ambrose Sutton (1594–1668) · Susan SUTTON (1593–1591)
Where this comes from
No relationship on this page has been checked against a record — the parents, marriages and children drawn above are what the family tree says. Nothing else has been found for them either way. How claims are labelled →
This person has a page because the tree names them beside someone this archive follows. Nothing has been researched for them here, and records that carry their name are filed in the register under the name and not assigned to them: a name is not a person.
Sources attached in the tree
- Geni World Family Tree — https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-40000-223835779/john-sutton-in-geni-world-family-tree
- Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1516743_OYYV6GKUXZAWW3JW7N66N44DJOOKXCA_OYYV6GKUXZAWW3JW7N66N44DJOOKXCA/john-sutton
These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →
← All 844 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled