The D'Arcy Archive
Le Havre, 1843 · found 14 September 2026

Daughter of the late Major-General D'Arcy

A death notice in a London paper names Robert D'Arcy's rank, his corps and the fact of his death — and calls the dead woman his daughter.

Robert D'Arcy's parentage of anybody has rested, until this fortnight, on a family tree. Two contemporary newspaper notices now name him as a father. The second of them is the better one, because it gives his corps.

A claim on this page was wrong, and the correction to it was wrong too. This page said the Morning Herald notice of 1843 was “the first record anywhere to give Robert D'Arcy a corps as well as a rank”. On 15 September the Hampshire Chronicle of 1823 disproved it. WITHIN THE HOUR, THE 1806 MARRIAGE NOTICE DISPROVED THE CORRECTION. Margaret's own wedding was reported at the time, and reported like this:

“At Chatham, CAPTAIN J. M. JONES, of the ROYAL DENBIGH MILITIA, to MISS D'ARCY, ELDEST DAUGHTER OF COL. D'ARCY, OF THE ROYAL ENGINEERS.”

Oxford University and City Herald, Saturday 1 November 1806, page 2. The Chester Courant of 11 November adds the church and the officiant: “at Chatham Church, by the Rev. I. T. Jones”.

So the corps is on record in 1806, thirty-seven years before the notice this page was built around — in the report of this very marriage. What survives is smaller and still worth having: the 1843 notice is the only one that calls her his daughter AFTER his death, and the only one that says “late”. The 1806 notice is better on every other count, including “ELDEST DAUGHTER”, which fixes her place among the ten children. corrected twice in one day Both earlier notices →
Morning Herald (London), Monday 13 February 1843, page 8

The notice

At Havre, MARGARET, wife of MAJOR JONES, DENBIGH MILITIA, and DAUGHTER OF THE LATE MAJOR-GENERAL D'ARCY, R.E. documented

Major-General. Royal Engineers. Late — he had died in 1827. There is one man that describes, and this archive has his commission of 1776, his marriage of 1779, five gazetted promotions, seventeen death notices and a funeral at Chatham with military honours.

Two notices, thirty-eight years apart

Everything that calls Robert D'Arcy a parent

WhenPaperWhat it says
23 September 1805 Salisbury and Winchester Journal “Captain GEORGE D'ARCY … SON [of] LIEUT. COLONEL D'ARCY [to] Miss Ludlam of Guernsey”
Rank only. Robert had been gazetted Lieutenant-Colonel six months earlier. →
13 February 1843 Morning Herald “MARGARET, wife of Major Jones, Denbigh Militia, and DAUGHTER OF THE LATE MAJOR-GENERAL D'ARCY, R.E.”
Rank AND corps AND the fact of his death. Nothing else in England fits it. →
Argus, or Broad-sheet of the Empire, 1 April 1843, page 15; also the Caernarvon & Denbigh Herald of the same day

Major John Maddock Jones

“21st, at Ingonville, near Havre, MAJOR MADDOCK JONES, late of the ROYAL DENBIGH MILITIA, and PEN-Y-BRYN, RUABON.”

He married Margarett Maria Isabella D'Arcy at Chatham St Mary in 1806, her brother JOSEPH signing as witness. His will was proved on 24 January 1844 and is at Kew as PROB 11/1991/312. It has never been opened.

They died within weeks of each other at Le Havre in the early months of 1843 — she in February, he on the 21st of the following month, at Ingouville on the hill above the port. Why a Denbighshire militia major and his wife were living in Normandy is not something this archive can yet answer. Half-pay officers went to France in the 1830s and 1840s because it was cheap, and a great many of them died there.
Archives départementales de la Seine-Maritime, 4 E 9077 — Le Havre, ancienne commune d'Ingouville, registre des décès, 1843

The register, read

Both deaths are in the French civil register. It is digitised, free, and asks for no account. This archive pursued these two deaths through the National Archives at Kew for a month, where they sit behind a subscription or a journey. The acts were never hard to reach. Nobody had gone and looked.

Act N° 43 · view 23 · 1 February 1843 · declared at four in the afternoon

Acte de Décès de Marguéritta Maria Elisabella Darcy, sans profession, décédée de ce jour sur les six heures du matin en son domicile situé en cette ville, rue de l'Hôpital, maison Lechevalier, âgée de soixante-un ans, née — le lieu de sa naissance est inconnu — épouse de John Maddack Jones. documented

Age
sixty-one — which puts her birth about 1781
Died
six in the morning, at her own house in the rue de l'Hôpital
Birthplace
entered as unknown
Declared by
Jean Baptiste Lecordier, rentier, fifty-nine, and Jean Olivier Quesney, rentier, fifty-eight and a half — both of Ingouville, neither a relative
Act N° 113 · view 58 · 21 March 1843 · declared at three in the afternoon

Acte de Décès de John Maddack Jones (Major), vivant de son revenu, décédé de ce jour sur les huit heures du matin en son domicile situé en cette ville rue du Champ de Foire, âgé de soixante-huit ans, né — le lieu de sa naissance inconnu — fils de — les noms et prénoms de ses père et mère sont inconnus — veuf de Marguéritta Maria Elisabella Darcy. documented

Age
sixty-eight — which puts his birth about 1774
Died
eight in the morning, rue du Champ de Foire — not the street where she had died seven weeks before
Parents
both entered as unknown
Declared by
Généreux Edouard Laillet, appariteur de police, twenty-two, and Jean Philippe Hébert, cultivateur, forty-eight — both of Ingouville, neither a relative

An age is the thing this page has wanted since it was written. Sixty-one on 1 February 1843 puts Margaret's birth about 1781 — the first dating of a child of Robert D'Arcy that comes from a record rather than from a tree. Sixty-eight puts her husband's about 1774: seven years her senior, and thirty-two when he married her at Chatham in 1806.

Each act names the other person. Hers calls her the wife of John Maddack Jones. His, seven weeks later, calls him the widower of Marguéritta Maria Elisabella Darcy. A marriage entered at Chatham in 1806 is confirmed in 1843 by French clerks who had never heard of Chatham and spelled both names by ear.

A date the declarants could not have known. And the age does something the act's writers could not have intended. This archive already carried a birth date for her — 26 September 1781, at Portsmouth — taken from the family tree and never matched to a record. A woman born on 26 September 1781 is sixty-one years and four months old on 1 February 1843, which is exactly what two strangers in Ingouville told the mayor. They had no idea who she was: her birthplace and her parents are both entered as unknown in the same sentence. The date they could not have known is the date the tree gives, and the act confirms it to the month. It also fixes her place in the family. Her brother Joseph was born on 14 March 1780 and baptised at Portsea five days later; a sister born in September 1781 is eighteen months behind him, and the 1806 marriage notice calls her Robert D'Arcy's ELDEST DAUGHTER. The three statements agree, and none of them was written with the others in view.
And what they do not give. What the acts do not give is Robert D'Arcy. Both record that the birthplace of the dead person is unknown, and his adds that the names of his father and mother are unknown too. The declarants were strangers: a police appariteur of twenty-two, a farmer, two men of private means — four neighbours, each act noting that they were not relatives. Two English people in their sixties had died in a French suburb among people who did not know where either of them came from. The D'Arcy parentage still rests where it rested, on the English notices. The French register says when Margaret was born. It says nothing about to whom.
One wrong volume first. The J section of a décennale table for 1843–1852 was read right through and held no Jones — Jean, Jouette, Junais, nine entries and nothing else. It was the wrong Ingouville: a village near Saint-Valery-en-Caux, sixty kilometres up the coast. The image URL said so, and so did the arithmetic, because forty-eight views cannot hold thirty years of births, marriages and deaths for a town of fifteen thousand. The right table spends three hundred and nine views on a single decade. The miss is on the search log with the control that would have caught it. The search log →

What it changes

  1. It is the first record to give Robert D'Arcy a corps as well as a rank. Everything else that names him as a father says only “Lieut. Colonel D'Arcy”. This says Major-General, Royal Engineers, late — and that is a description with exactly one referent.
  2. It confirms the Chatham marriage from the far end of a life. The archive has held the 1806 marriage of Margarett Maria Isabella D'Arcy to John Maddock Jones since it read the Chatham register. Thirty-seven years later a London paper describes the same couple in the same terms, in an obituary neither of them wrote.
  3. And it makes three of Robert's children documented as his. Joseph by his baptism at Portsea in 1780; George Pitt by the marriage notice of 1805; Margaret by this. Richard remains inferred and Constantine unplaced.
And what it does not. It still says nothing about where Robert came from. A man can be securely somebody's father and remain nobody's son, and after a fortnight of records that is precisely the position. The claim above him →

Robert and Jean's family → · The 1806 marriage → · His will at Kew →