Dinah Sneyd
Of Madeley, Staffordshire, England.
FamilyAsserted by the family tree. No record has been found for them, and none has been shown against them either. How this archive grades a claim →
None of the 9 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →
More than one sibling here carries the same name — William Sneyd. They are drawn separately. This archive does not merge records on a name. Why →
The record
| Born | 21 FEB 1772 | Madeley, Staffordshire, England |
Counted here with the Sneyd family · that family →
Family
Parents
William Sneyd · Mary Blackbourne
Brothers and sisters
Samuel Sneyd (1769–1856) · Theodosia Sneyd (b. 1773) · Sarah Sneyd (b. 1776) · James Sneyd (b. 1779) · William Sneyd (b. 1780) · Mary Sneyd (b. 1788) · William Sneyd (b. 1769)
Where this comes from
No relationship on this page has been checked against a record — the parents, marriages and children drawn above are what the family tree says. Nothing else has been found for them either way. How claims are labelled →
Everywhere Dinah appears in this archive
Every page of this site that writes aboutDinah Sneyd in prose, gathered automatically — 1 in total. This counts pages, not records: the lists and registers are skipped on purpose, so a person can be well documented and appear here once or not at all. How claims are labelled →
…neyd 1760–1835 · England Samuel Sneyd 1769–1856 · Madeley William Sneyd b. 1769 · Madeley Dinah Sneyd b. 1772 · Madeley Theodosia Sneyd b. 1773 · Madeley Sarah Sneyd b. 1776 · Madeley James Sneyd b. 1779 · Madeley William Sneyd b.…
Sources attached in the tree
- FamilySearch Family Tree — https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-40001-353267784/dinah-moss-born-sneyd-in-familysearch-family-tree
These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →
← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled