The D'Arcy Archive
1872–1937

Geraldine D'Arcy

Of Brisbane, Australia.

FamilyAsserted by the family tree. No record has been found for them, and none has been shown against them either. How this archive grades a claim →

Geraldine D'Arcy1872–1937in the tree
written in a record this archive has read from the family tree, untested

None of the 1 relationship shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →

The record

Born29 DEC 1872Brisbane, Australia
Died27 OCT 1937Epsom, Surrey, England

Counted here with the D'Arcy family · that family →

Family

Parents

G Norman D'Arcy

Married

Charles Ashkenazie Hunter · 17 JUN 1903 at Rathdown, Ireland

Where this comes from

No relationship on this page has been checked against a record — the parents, marriages and children drawn above are what the family tree says. Nothing else has been found for them either way. How claims are labelled →

Every entry naming Geraldine D'Arcy in the register →

Everywhere Geraldine appears in this archive

Every page of this site that writes aboutGeraldine D'Arcy in prose, gathered automatically — 1 in total. This counts pages, not records: the lists and registers are skipped on purpose, so a person can be well documented and appear here once or not at all. How claims are labelled →

The work list

…Pitt D'Arcy, «William Murdoch» inside Keith William Murdoch 1925-1996, «Geraldine» inside Geraldine D'Arcy 1872-1937. tools/check_living.py now has a json_pass that asks the narrower and better question: not whether a living name occurs…

Sources attached in the tree

  • Barnett Web Site — Geraldine D'Arcy
  • FamilySearch Family Tree — https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-40001-706887404/geraldine-norman-hunter-born-darcy-in-familysearch-family-tree

These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →

← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled