Josephine D'Arcy
Of Milford on Sea, Hampshire, England, United Kingdom.
DocumentedProved by 1 record. 1 record that names them has been read, set out on this page. How this archive grades a claim →
1 of the 9 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read; the other 8 come from the family tree and have not been tested. How claims are labelled →
The record
| Born | 6 JUL 1834 | Milford on Sea, Hampshire, England, United Kingdom |
| Died | 5 NOV 1903 | London, Greater London, England, United Kingdom |
| Buried | — | Family Vaults, Milford House, Hampshire, UK |
Counted here with the D'Arcy family · that family →
Family
Parents
Married
Lt Col Thomas Anderson · 18 NOV 1958 at London
Brothers and sisters
George Abbas Kooli D'Arcy (1818–1885) · Robert West D'Arcy (1820–1862) · Richard Wellesley D'Arcy (1824–1859) · Catherine Lucy Jane D'Arcy (1831–1877) · John Hyde D'Arcy (1832–1852) · Frank Hyde D'Arcy (1838–1868) · Joseph William D'Arcy (1840–1882) · William David d'Arcy (b. 1842)
Where this comes from
1 of the relationships drawn above is written in a record this archive has read. baptism, Milford, 1836.
What the records say
Every record this archive has read that names Josephine D'Arcy. The name is unique in this tree, so these are his or hers. The whole register →
baptism · 1836, Milford · father JOSEPH, mother KATHERINE LUCY ELIZA
recordHampshire Baptisms (Hampshire Genealogical Society) · the source ↗
Everywhere Josephine appears in this archive
Every page of this site that writes aboutJosephine D'Arcy in prose, gathered automatically — 1 in total. This counts pages, not records: the lists and registers are skipped on purpose, so a person can be well documented and appear here once or not at all. How claims are labelled →
…841, born Hampshire documented John D'Arcy Son. aged 8 in 1841, born Hampshire documented Josephine D'Arcy Daughter. aged 6 in 1841, born Hampshire documented Frank D'Arcy Son. aged 2 in 1841 documented Joseph D'Arcy Son. an infant in 1…
What is written about Josephine
Carried across from the family tree, with its markup stripped. Family testimony, not an independent record — valuable, and labelled.
← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled