The D'Arcy Archive
?–1769

Margaret Richards

Of Parish of Elmore.

FamilyAsserted by the family tree. No record has been found for them, and none has been shown against them either. How this archive grades a claim →

Margaret Richards?–1769direct line · generation 10
marriedThomas Sanigerb. 1711tree · direct line
written in a record this archive has read from the family tree, untested

None of the 2 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →

The record

Born—Parish of Elmore
Died8 APR 1769Berkeley, Gloucester, England

direct line · generation 10 counting back from the present day

Family

Married

Thomas Saniger · 3 FEB 1733

Children

Thomas Saniger (1744–1819)

Where this comes from

No relationship on this page has been checked against a record — the parents, marriages and children drawn above are what the family tree says. Nothing else has been found for them either way. How claims are labelled →

Every entry naming Margaret Richards in the register →

See this generation on the spine →

Everywhere Margaret appears in this archive

Every page of this site that writes aboutMargaret Richards in prose, gathered automatically — 1 in total. This counts pages, not records: the lists and registers are skipped on purpose, so a person can be well documented and appear here once or not at all. How claims are labelled →

One vowel

…ot. She is on Berkeley now, with the rest of them. John Saniger, Lydia, Catherine Cotton, Margaret Richards, William and Thomas Saniger — eleven people on the parish the whole English line comes out of. It changes no finding on this page…

Sources attached in the tree

  • Guthrie Web Site — Margaret Saniger (born Richards)

These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →

← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled