The D'Arcy Archive
1669–1695

Ralph Sneyd

Of Bradwell, England.

DisputedReached only through a link that has been looked for in the right registers and found to be wrong. What was tested →

Ralph Sneyd1669–1695generation — of the tree, above the Keele graft
marriedFrances Noel1673–1751tree · above the Keele graft
written in a record this archive has read from the family tree, untested above a graft this archive rejects

None of the 3 relationships shown here is written in a record this archive has read. Every one comes from the family tree. That is not a claim that they are wrong — it is a statement about what has been checked, and on this site the difference is the point. How claims are labelled →

3 of these links sit above a graft. The archive has tested the join they hang from and rejected it — the D'Arcys of Hornby Castle are unevidenced, the Sneyds of Keele Hall disproved. The people are drawn because the tree carries them, and struck through because nothing attaches them to this family. Both grafts, in full →

The record

Born22 DEC 1669Bradwell, England
Died8 APR 1695

direct line

Counted here with the Sneyd family · that family →

Family

Parents

Ralph Sneyd

Married

Frances Noel

Children

Ralph Sneyd (1692–1733)

Where this comes from

above a graft This person reaches the family only through the Keele join, which this archive has tested and rejected. They are published because the tree carries them and deleting a claim is not the same as testing it. The graft →

Every entry naming Ralph Sneyd in the register →

See this generation on the spine →

Others of the same name

This family reuses forenames relentlessly. These are different people, kept apart on purpose rather than merged into one. Why →

Sources attached in the tree

  • Defranceski Family Site (23andMe) — https://www.myheritage.com/person-1500434_OYYV6JX2FFVR675GBZX6YSCN5A6IS7Q_OYYV6JX2FFVR675GBZX6YSCN5A6IS7Q/ralph-sneyd-iv

These are the citations the family tree carries. Where this archive has checked one against the original, it says so on the relevant page. Method →

← All 473 people · The families · The direct line · How claims are labelled